Let the kid have fun. Hes awkward enough as is.
That's autism. It seems fairly obvious, too. Wish the family shared that and brought awareness/empathy to people that are readily misunderstood.
Let the kid have fun. Hes awkward enough as is.
That's autism. It seems fairly obvious, too. Wish the family shared that and brought awareness/empathy to people that are readily misunderstood.
RED. BULL. OUT.
#SaveTheMetro
That's autism. It seems fairly obvious, too.
We are good enough to beat the best teams, and bad enough to lose to the worst teams.
In general, we dehumanize people/kids who are not seen as neurotypical ("crazy" "psycho" "headcase" "throw em in the loony bin").
RED. BULL. OUT.
#SaveTheMetro
Who is WE?In general, we dehumanize people/kids who are not seen as neurotypical
We are good enough to beat the best teams, and bad enough to lose to the worst teams.
RED. BULL. OUT.
#SaveTheMetro
Someone called Barron awkward, so I said what I think is going on there.
We have now come full circle.
Where do you get off, calling somebody's kid autistic?
We are good enough to beat the best teams, and bad enough to lose to the worst teams.
RED. BULL. OUT.
#SaveTheMetro
Doubtful.I'm sorry
Yes. Especially when there is no actual empirical evidence to support the assertion.is that an insult, prosecutor?
Only when accurately applied. Calling a tall person short, or a short person tall, is not value neutral. Neither is an unqualified diagnosis by someone without the training or experience to make such a Dx, or without a testing and observational basis to support it.It's a value-neutral word to me, like tall or short.
Recognizing difference is not mocking it.
We are good enough to beat the best teams, and bad enough to lose to the worst teams.
RED. BULL. OUT.
#SaveTheMetro
We are good enough to beat the best teams, and bad enough to lose to the worst teams.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users