Jump to content


Photo

College Football 2009/2010 (R)


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
791 replies to this topic

#16 LFC1892

LFC1892

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,346 posts
  • Location:The Valley
  • Supports:G's, 'Pool, Hoops, Bayern, Fleet

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:17 PM

my team predictions: UCLA 8-4 & Notre Dame 10-2


Notre Dame sucks up to the long legged Mack Daddy.

I can't take it no mo.

#17 romero03

romero03

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,756 posts
  • Supports:USMNT

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:52 PM

i hope this guy falls to temptation and gets laid soon. Posted Image that way his super powers go away.










fake edit* :ph34r: GATORS SUCK :ph34r:
Twitter

Dodgers, Lakers, Raiders, Galaxy, LA Kings, ASU, Notre Dame(football)
 

#18 dhines

dhines

    Player/Manager

  • LARS Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,053 posts
  • Location:SFV
  • Supports:Galaxy, USMNT, Cruz Azul, USC

Posted 15 August 2009 - 01:34 PM

my team predictions: UCLA 8-4 & Notre Dame 10-2

ucla? hmmm . . . . but ND? bullshit. USC is yet another near lock to feed them their balls. that would mean 10-1 outside of the USC game, and that just ain't gonna happen. granted these pussies have only 4 away games, but still.

i think 95% of the college team predictions are total BS because we haven't seen anyone play. for example, those picking USC, Florida, Oklahoma to win it all . . . are doing it off of history, and not the current team. some of them will be right, but that doesn't mean it was anything more than a guess. until the 3rd week (or so), no one really knows what to expect. the exception to that would be the rare occasion that nearly an entire team is returning, that does happen but not that often in college football.

i am just glad the season is about to start.

and just to go on record, i still don't give a shit about the polls or the elected champion game. i want to see my trojans win all their games, and whereever that puts them, that is all a trojan fan can ask for.

#19 Gen'Buck'Turgidson

Gen'Buck'Turgidson

    Dir. of Football Operations

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,116 posts
  • Location:Crenshaw & Torrance
  • Interests:THE 5 STAGES OF LARS MEMBERSHIP
    1) LARS Worship
    2) Hyper-Enthusiasm
    3) Delusional Misbelief
    4) Cognizant Sarcasm
    5) Ambivalent Apathy
    ::: Greenwood FC :::
    --------------------
  • Supports:Pints of Jamesons

Posted 15 August 2009 - 04:14 PM

UCLA will surprise many. U$$$$$$$$$$$$C will suck ass this year. I exect Oregon State to win hte Pac10. Ohio State is going to run wild over U$$$$$$$$$$C at the Horshoe.

God, you are like a roadmap of what NOT to believe.

You aren't on my ignore list though. It's fun reading your posts...

Go Bears.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
-H. L. Mencken
----------------------
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "unskilled people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average.

#20 FuzzBall

FuzzBall

    First Team

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts
  • Location:South Gate, CA
  • Interests:Football, Fútbol, Fußball, De voetbal, Futebol, フットボール
  • Supports:LA G's, Chelsea F.C.

Posted 15 August 2009 - 11:53 PM

the sign guy is good for gambling on games. i'll just bet against everything he tells me.

#21 romero03

romero03

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,756 posts
  • Supports:USMNT

Posted 16 August 2009 - 01:50 AM

Notre Dame sucks up to the long legged Mack Daddy.

I can't take it no mo.

Are you saying ND gets pimped out?
Twitter

Dodgers, Lakers, Raiders, Galaxy, LA Kings, ASU, Notre Dame(football)
 

#22 Eric B

Eric B

    First Team

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,061 posts
  • Supports:Los Angeles Galaxy

Posted 17 August 2009 - 01:55 PM

The Papists schedule this year is hella weak, with games @ Michigan (still rebuilding?) and Pitt, along with hosting USC, being their only real challenges. 9-3 is not out of the realm of possibility...

#23 RobertTheBruce

RobertTheBruce

    Dir. of Football Operations

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,432 posts
  • Location:Long Beach
  • Supports:Galaxy dickheads! Arsenal

Posted 17 August 2009 - 05:39 PM

I'm betting they still lose at least 4: Mich St, USC, Pitt and at least one other from one of these, maybe two: Connecticut, Navy, BC or Stanford.



Speaking of weak schedules, I was perusing Michigan's non conf games: Delaware St, E Michigan and W Michigan. I hope that's not what they had scheduled two years ago when they were coming off an 11-2. That's weak on a Bill Snyder/ Kansas St scale.

#24 galaxyforever13

galaxyforever13

    First Team

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Location:TORRANCE, CA
  • Interests:LA GALAXY<br />LA LAKERS<br />UCLA BRUINS<br />LONG BEACH STATE 49ERS<br />MAN CITY
  • Supports:LA GALAXY, Man City, USMNT

Posted 18 August 2009 - 10:53 PM

As a a season ticket holder, the past couple of years have sucked. Still, i think in the 2nd year of the new coaching regime will be better than the first.
"If you go out with a girl and they say she has a great personality, she's ugly. If they tell you a guy works hard, he can't play a lick. Same thing."---Charles Barkley

#25 dhines

dhines

    Player/Manager

  • LARS Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,053 posts
  • Location:SFV
  • Supports:Galaxy, USMNT, Cruz Azul, USC

Posted 18 August 2009 - 11:09 PM

As a a season ticket holder, the past couple of years have sucked. Still, i think in the 2nd year of the new coaching regime will be better than the first.

shouldn't this be rolled into the college football thread?

#26 dhines

dhines

    Player/Manager

  • LARS Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,053 posts
  • Location:SFV
  • Supports:Galaxy, USMNT, Cruz Azul, USC

Posted 18 August 2009 - 11:15 PM

I'm betting they still lose at least 4: Mich St, USC, Pitt and at least one other from one of these, maybe two: Connecticut, Navy, BC or Stanford.

when it comes to college football, some things are always a lock:

1) sign guy is great at indicating who will win a game, so long as you do the opposite as what he says
2) the SEC and ND are always overrated
3) ND always loses to at least one of the 'gimmies' on their schedule.


that being said, i will be shocked if ND finishes the upcoming season with only 4 losses

UCLA will surprise many. U$$$$$$$$$$$$C will suck ass this year. I exect Oregon State to win hte Pac10. Ohio State is going to run wild over U$$$$$$$$$$C at the Horshoe.


SG, do you actually believe the junk you post? or, are you just throwing it out there to see people react?

#27 The Sign Guy

The Sign Guy

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,458 posts
  • Location:Anaheim!!
  • Supports:Galaxy Arsenal

Posted 18 August 2009 - 11:22 PM

U$$$$$$$C

U$$$$$$$$C

U$$$$$$$$C

U$$$C

fake edit:
Posted Image

#28 Gen'Buck'Turgidson

Gen'Buck'Turgidson

    Dir. of Football Operations

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,116 posts
  • Location:Crenshaw & Torrance
  • Interests:THE 5 STAGES OF LARS MEMBERSHIP
    1) LARS Worship
    2) Hyper-Enthusiasm
    3) Delusional Misbelief
    4) Cognizant Sarcasm
    5) Ambivalent Apathy
    ::: Greenwood FC :::
    --------------------
  • Supports:Pints of Jamesons

Posted 18 August 2009 - 11:25 PM

U$$$$$$$C

U$$$$$$$$C

U$$$$$$$$C

U$$$C

fake edit:
Posted Image

Yess!!!

Not only does that means USC will be poor and that Cal truly rules, but Cal will also make a profit off your bitch ass.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
-H. L. Mencken
----------------------
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "unskilled people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average.

#29 dhines

dhines

    Player/Manager

  • LARS Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,053 posts
  • Location:SFV
  • Supports:Galaxy, USMNT, Cruz Azul, USC

Posted 18 August 2009 - 11:39 PM

Yess!!!

Not only does that means USC will be poor and that Cal truly rules, but Cal will also make a profit off your bitch ass.

hahahahahahahahahaha

#30 galaxyforever13

galaxyforever13

    First Team

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Location:TORRANCE, CA
  • Interests:LA GALAXY<br />LA LAKERS<br />UCLA BRUINS<br />LONG BEACH STATE 49ERS<br />MAN CITY
  • Supports:LA GALAXY, Man City, USMNT

Posted 19 August 2009 - 12:01 AM

shouldn't this be rolled into the college football thread?

possibly, but i thought UCLA is shitty enough to have their own...
"If you go out with a girl and they say she has a great personality, she's ugly. If they tell you a guy works hard, he can't play a lick. Same thing."---Charles Barkley




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users