Jump to content

We should change back to 3-3-3-1


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1
Komba

Komba

    Dir. of Football Operations

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,368 posts

Still think we should change back to the 3-3-3-1.   Just suits this team best.  Armas obviously also wants to crowbar Tarek onto the field, well that formation does that.



#2
Eleazar

Eleazar

    One who helps God

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,368 posts
  • Location:New York City
  • Interests:Metro, the USMNT and Boston College Athletics
  • Supports:METRO

also helped Royer become the goal scorer that he is. 


RIP Guillermo Romulo, Alexander Francis Orig and Celenio Eleazar.

 

RIP Cesar Castello, Mike Vallo, Glenn Stampiglia, Bob Paquette, and Warren Lee

 

"Team That I Dream Of" and "Faithful To The Colors" 

 

 


#3
elf

elf

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,710 posts
  • Supports:Metrostars

Still think we should change back to the 3-3-3-1.   Just suits this team best.  Armas obviously also wants to crowbar Tarek onto the field, well that formation does that.


I agree, but only when we play teams that Aim to do long balls.

#4
Eleazar

Eleazar

    One who helps God

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,368 posts
  • Location:New York City
  • Interests:Metro, the USMNT and Boston College Athletics
  • Supports:METRO

I agree, but only when we play teams that Aim to do long balls.

 

so basically ATL in last yr's playoffs. or anytime we play in the playoffs/USOC. i did suggest last yr that we go 5 in the back and have Lade at LWB, since Taxi was out. Armas chose 4 in the back instead. 


RIP Guillermo Romulo, Alexander Francis Orig and Celenio Eleazar.

 

RIP Cesar Castello, Mike Vallo, Glenn Stampiglia, Bob Paquette, and Warren Lee

 

"Team That I Dream Of" and "Faithful To The Colors" 

 

 


#5
elf

elf

    Player/Manager

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,710 posts
  • Supports:Metrostars

 
so basically ATL in last yr's playoffs. or anytime we play in the playoffs/USOC. i did suggest last yr that we go 5 in the back and have Lade at LWB, since Taxi was out. Armas chose 4 in the back instead. 


I think whenever we have too much possession we should go with 5 in the back. This team doesnt do well in transition and when we have the ball.

That is why we play way much better against good teams and play poorly against weak teams.

#6
Komba

Komba

    Dir. of Football Operations

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,368 posts

THink we should go with that other formation against everyone.  We rarely get the better of play anymore anyway.  The formation also suits the personnel we have and it changes everything opposing teams have to defend because basically nobody uses the formation the way we do.

 

What will happen though is that we'll continue to sit around 500, and then Armas will get desperate and finally switch, to where we'll dominate the game but find a way to lose.  THen he'll move away from it forever.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users