Muyl didn't get consistent minutes in the exact same position he's playing now?
Here are Alex minutes by game under Marsch in 2018:
0, 0, 90, 0, 3, 0, 3, 19, 23, 1, 17, 8, 89, 90, 26, 60
And, hi minutes by game under Armas:
90, 59, 13, 81, 21, 25, 20, 63, 1, 19, 76, 23, 25, 25, 79, 76
His minutes since Armas look more consistent to me... Alex was an unused sub four times under Marsch. The first two are explainable because they bookended CCL matches, but the next two cam after Muyl played very well against Minn U and were part of a four game stretch in which he played no more than three minutes.
Since Armas has been manager, Muyl has only played less than 13 minutes in a match one time and that was part of the five games in 15 days stretch.
I'm not saying Marsch didn't play Alex, of course he did. I was one of the loudest saying he was playing too much. My only point was that once he lost his spot to Valot, he wasn't always getting the 15-20 minutes sub appearances Armas was giving him when RZA started a few games over him.
And, regarding my comment about position, I was referring more to Etienne there.
Alex and DE are both playing better now than either has did with Marsch. Call it what you, I probe to give Armas credit as I think he's dealt with players more in a more even manner. I think Marsch was more feast or famine - you are my starter and will play 80+ minutes most matches or you're not, and maybe I'll get you in.