College Basketball 2008-09
#167
Posted 05 April 2009 - 12:54 AM
#169
Posted 05 April 2009 - 02:14 PM
#170
Posted 11 April 2009 - 04:56 PM
so who won? tourney was so boring i didn't tune in this year . . .MSU will beat UNC!
#171
Posted 15 April 2009 - 10:29 AM
#172
Posted 16 April 2009 - 12:47 AM
On second thought, I will actually enjoy watching him fail.
-H. L. Mencken
----------------------
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "unskilled people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average.
#173
Posted 04 May 2009 - 02:40 AM
Q: Did Cal enjoy any financial benefit from appearing in the NCAA Tournament?
A: Yes, but the Bears have to share the benefits with the rest of the Pac-10, which pools money earned by its teams in the NCAA Tournament. Each game a Pac-10 team plays in the NCAAs (until the Final Four) earns a "unit." Units are added up and are rewarded annually on a six-year cycle. This year, for instance, the Pac-10 earned $206,000 each for 65 units, accumulated over the past six seasons. Added up, it equals $13.39 million. Divide that by 10 teams, and each Pac-10 school, including Cal, earned $1.339 million. The money comes from the NCAA and its TV package with CBS. The per-unit payout increases approximately 8 percent each year.
— Jeff Faraudo, Cal basketball beat writer
-H. L. Mencken
----------------------
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "unskilled people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average.
#175
Posted 10 June 2009 - 12:43 PM
#176
Posted 10 June 2009 - 02:18 PM
you mean same old tim floyd . . . dude needs to learn that the only school that cheats in LA is UCLA. i am glad that piece of trash is gone from USC, i would rather lose than cheat.same ol' USC, always cheating! Floyd had a good thing going at USC but had to fuck it up. nice one douchebag!
i have faith that USC will land a good coach and continue to develop our basketball program.
#177
Posted 10 June 2009 - 03:56 PM
dude needs to learn that the only school that cheats in LA is UCLA.
You tell 'em!
Signed,
Reggie Bush
#178
Posted 11 June 2009 - 12:33 AM
I think you seriously believe your own bs, hiney...weird.you mean same old tim floyd . . . dude needs to learn that the only school that cheats in LA is UCLA. i am glad that piece of trash is gone from USC, i would rather lose than cheat.
i have faith that USC will land a good coach and continue to develop our basketball program.
-H. L. Mencken
----------------------
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "unskilled people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it." The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average.
#179
Posted 12 June 2009 - 05:04 PM
they need to fill the new basketball arena, therefore they have to go after a good coach. i don't put any of the blame of USC (for what floyd did), as if it was common knowledge floyd wouldn't have had an offer from UofA.Too bad about Floyd...he was moving the program nicely. Should be interesting to see who they hire.
I think you seriously believe your own bs, hiney...weird.
Eric B --
do i really need to site the number of violations UCLA has had over the past 15 - 20 years? if UCLA actually mattered nationally, more people would be aware of their players short commings.
if you are going to hammer on bush for being a scumbag, have at it . . . but there is no way you can put that on pete or USC. how can a coach be responsible for what a player does outside of the university? so far as i know, not one drop of evidence says that USC knew anything about bush taking money, nor is there anything that says USC didn't have proper internal controls in place.
#180
Posted 12 June 2009 - 07:29 PM
do i really need to site the number of violations UCLA has had over the past 15 - 20 years?
No, but that's not relevant since your point is that "USC doesn't cheat", which as we've seen, is bullshit.
if you are going to hammer on bush for being a scumbag, have at it . . .
Done
but there is no way you can put that on pete or USC. how can a coach be responsible for what a player does outside of the university? so far as i know, not one drop of evidence says that USC knew anything about bush taking money, nor is there anything that says USC didn't have proper internal controls in place.
O Rly?
IF USC had the proper controls in place, they would have caught the Bush and Mayo situations in the first place. It appears your defense then is that Mike Garrett's department is incompetent. Which other than the lucky hiring of Pete Carroll, you're actually right. Carry on...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users